Browse Day: June 29, 2017

Mumbai: Six prison officials booked for allegedly killing convict in Byculla jail

Mumbai: Six prison officials booked for allegedly killing convict in Byculla jail

The detainees had protested after the death of Manjula Shetya because she was assaulted and beaten by sexual jailers.

Mumbai: Six Prison Officials Charged with Murder Sentenced to Prison in Byculla

Five officers and a jailor at Byculla Prison, Mumbai, were set aside to assault and kill a detained Manjula Shetye sexually, the Hindustan Times reported Tuesday.

Shetye died on June 23 provoked a protest, and former media tycoon Indrani Mukerjea (pictured), who was jailed for killing his daughter Sheena Bora, was one of 200 women detained for committing a mutiny in the jail.

A witness has submitted a first briefing paper on the death of Shetye Nagpada police station. He said the six prison officials were brutally beaten and raped the 38-year-old prisoner to complain about two eggs and five slices of bread that lacked the morning ration.

The witness told police Shetye was first called in the private room of Manisha Pokharkar’s agent, Hindustan Times reported.

She was attacked there and returned to the barracks. Later, the female police officers Bindu Naikade, Waseema Shaikh, Shital Shegaonkar, Surekha Gulve and Aarti Shingne did strip and raped with a stick, or lathi.

Initially, no official was only arrived with Shetye said the FIR. Shetye was taken to the resident doctor after being unconscious in the bathroom. He died at the JJ Hospital.

The autopsy report said Shetye was about 11 to 13 blue, while Dean TP Lahane had told Hindustan Times that his lungs were damaged.

Meanwhile, police are likely to question Indrani Mukerjea about his role in the alleged prison riot.

Mukerjea said how Shetye was killed and alleged that prison officials had threatened sexual assault, NDTV reported. She will appear before a special CBI court on Wednesday.

His lawyer Gunjan Mangala also alleged that prison officials had assaulted Mukerjea. “The brown marks can be seen on Indrani Mukerjea’s body all over after being hit by prison officials,” Mangala told Tuesday in court, according to The Times of India.

Al Qaeda vows to target Indian Army officers who have the ‘blood of Kashmiris on their hands’

Al Qaeda vows to target Indian Army officers who have the ‘blood of Kashmiris on their hands’

In a 20-page document, the celebration of terror has accused India of “destroying the houses of Muslims, to weaken them in social status and to force them to convert to Hinduism.”

Al Qaeda vowed to target Indian army officers that the “Cashmere of blood in their hands”

Al Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent has said that it would target members of the Indian Army that “the blood of our Kashmiri brothers in their hands.”

The team has published a 20-page document entitled “Code of Conduct for Mujahideen in the Subcontinent,” listing their goals and objectives in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar.

“All military personnel are our target, whether in war zones or in barracks to their bases,” the document said.

“Even the holiday staff is not exempt due to their fight against the application of sharia and defending the system of infidelity.”

Accusing India of oppressing Muslims in Kashmir and across the country, AQIS – a branch of the global al Qaeda militant group established in 2014 – said the Indian state “also destroyed their [Muslim] homes, weakens the condition Social and forced to convert to Hinduism in “also said that India is a ‘strong ally’ of the United States, Russia and Israel ‘against jihadist and Islamic awakening throughout the region.”

AQIS has also accused India of “usurping” Muslim water from Bangladesh, destroying its agriculture and controlling the country’s trade and industry. “History shows that India always wants to live the Muslims of Bengal as slaves,” the document said.

In the 20-page document, the branch of Al Qaeda has listed the separatist Hindu organizations, the Indian army, the “blasphemers” and officials “genocide of the Muslims”, since the partition as the target. In Myanmar, it has classified the country’s army and armed Buddhist groups as a target ….

Centre downplays US reference to ‘Indian-administered Kashmir’, says it happened in the past too

Centre downplays US reference to ‘Indian-administered Kashmir’, says it happened in the past too

The Narendra Modi government has minimized the use of “India-administered Jammu and Kashmir” by the United States during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the country, saying that similar terms were used in the past as well, reports PTI. On Monday, as chief Hizbul Mujahideen Syed Salahuddin’s announcement as a specially designated global terrorist, the US State Department said that the militant group had attributed responsibility for several attacks, including the explosives of the 2014 attack as “Jammu and Kashmir Administered by India. ”

Foreign Ministry spokesman Gopal Baglay said that the use of “India-administered Jammu and Kashmir” has been used by the United States to simply state that India’s position Syed Salahuddin was involved in terrorism against India border. He said that the US State Department had used terms reported on terrorism also terrorism in the past, especially between 2010 and 2013.

“The consistent position of India that the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India is well known,” said M. Baglay. He added that India welcomed the appointment of Syed Salahuddin, who had been designated as a global terrorist by the Donald Trump administration, which he described as “the strongest common expression of the commitment of both sides” in the fight against terrorism.

The use of the term, and the lack of response by the government, angered the opposition. The former finance minister and the head of Congress, P Chidambaram Wednesday questioned the government in a tweet. “The official United States declaration uses the term” Jammu and Kashmir administered by India. “How was India accepted?”

Congressman Ghulam Nabi Azad, the leader of the opposition in the Rajya Sabha, asked: “Why did not protested prime minister despite being on the ground American Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Defense and the Minister of the Interior that the problem? Why is BJP silent? Is not it a sale of national interests?